I find this story to be entirely disturbing. maybe even more than the Benghazi political cover up... If thats at all possible..
Lets Call It.... “Hillary and the Factitious Snipers.” ..
"I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some
kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with
our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."
i continue to be stunned everytime I read about this... This only goes to prove that this is mental illness folks.
The Video showed the tarmac welcome, but guess what? No Snipers
But that's not what happened, as demonstrated by CBS News video that
shows Clinton arriving on the tarmac under no visible duress, and
greeting a child who offers her a copy of a poem. The Washington Post
Factchecker also turned a skeptical eye on Clinton's comments, reporting
that a review of more than 100 news stories from the time documented no
security threats to the First Lady.
And that’s not all, she
retracted the remarks a week later, telling the Philadelphia Daily News
editorial board on March 24, 2008, that she "MISSPOKE”, not that she
LIED, but she "MISSPOKE”. And so we have a brand new word to put in the
Liberal’s dictionary...
And let’s not forget that Chelsea was under "Sniper Fire" as well.
Sunday, September 20, 2015
Thursday, July 9, 2015
OY
Hillary Clinton, who is the front-running presidential candidate for the Democrat’s who doesńt do interviews, and how doesn’t answer questions, finally sat down with CNN on Tuesday and said, "People should and do trust me." New York Times columnist Bill Safire must be rolling in his grave. A 1996 essay of his, "Blizzard of Lies," began, "Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our first lady — a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation — is a congenital liar." White House Press Secretary Mike McCurry responded: The lies he catalogued back then included her phony explanation for a 10,000% profit in 1979 commodity trading, which "amounted to a $100,000 bribe"; the firing of White House travel aides, "who were then harassed by the FBI and Justice Department to justify patronage replacement by Mrs. Clinton's cronies"; and "lying when she denied actively representing a criminal enterprise known as the Madison S&L."
TRUST HER? IS SHE KIDDING?
"She is in the longtime habit of lying," Safire wrote nearly two decades ago, "and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends."
"Trust me" is a game the Clintons have been playing for a long time.
No candidate has ever been less qualified to hold the office of President...
And considering the present occupant of the White House, that's really saying something.
I don't blame the Progressive Nazi Politicians, because this is exactly what they do I blame the over 40% of the American population who are ignorant enough to vote for stooges like Hillary Clinton...
Everyday we get new articles and more and more proof that she is a crook, lair, thief, and a corrupt politician, and so on we all know for decades that this old shit stain is a corrupt hag, the question is, will she face jail time for all this lawlessness!? Will there ever be a end to this dog and pony show with Hillary Clinton!?
..
TRUST HER? IS SHE KIDDING?
"She is in the longtime habit of lying," Safire wrote nearly two decades ago, "and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends."
"Trust me" is a game the Clintons have been playing for a long time.
No candidate has ever been less qualified to hold the office of President...
And considering the present occupant of the White House, that's really saying something.
I don't blame the Progressive Nazi Politicians, because this is exactly what they do I blame the over 40% of the American population who are ignorant enough to vote for stooges like Hillary Clinton...
Everyday we get new articles and more and more proof that she is a crook, lair, thief, and a corrupt politician, and so on we all know for decades that this old shit stain is a corrupt hag, the question is, will she face jail time for all this lawlessness!? Will there ever be a end to this dog and pony show with Hillary Clinton!?
..
Tuesday, March 3, 2015
The speech by Netanyahu to Congress was nothing less than great.
President Obama seems to have EITHER a blind spot or a lack of good sense, when it comes to the growing anti-Semitism, here in America and in Europe as well. . I don't believe it is a blind spot. I believe Obama is an anti-Semite, and his cold relationship with Netanyahu is not by any means limited to the situation in Iran..
The Iranians have made threats to “wipe Israel off the map”, presumably with nuclear weapons that they would acquire either by Obama’s willingness or by their deception, the Jewish world population would be cut nearly in half. And this is what it’s all about when the Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu addresses Congress.. As he said the world must act to prevent Iran’s nuclearization, since “the deadline for attaining this goal is getting extremely close.
And the only thing Netanyahu knows for sure is that the Iranians remain intent on being able to produce their own nuclear weapons. The only question left is will they do so with or without Obama’s help and his “blessing”!
Netanyahu is worried about Iran’s nuclear weapons program and the survival of nearly half of all the Jews in the world because they live in Israel.
It’s no secret there is no love-loss between Bibi Netanyahu and Barack Obama, but this third effort to urge Congress to go on record supporting the survival of Israel is necessary.
Obama has said in no uncertain terms that he wants to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. However, the world has learned that what is said by Iran is far from the truth.
What Netanyahu also knows is that President Obama seems to have blind spot when it comes to the growing anti-Semitism that resembles what existed in the 1930s in Europe. When Jews in a French kosher supermarket were murdered, Obama referred to it as an act of “violent, vicious zealots who behead people or randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli in Paris.”
Whoa! Siad Obama, It wasn’t “a bunch of folks.” They were Jews buying food for the Sabbath meal. And those “violent, vicious zealots” were Muslims, just like the ISIS Muslims beheading, crucifying, burning, kidnapping, and enslaving those they don’t kill for being Christian, Jewish, Yazidis, or just not Muslim enough!
Netanyahu’s speech will, indeed, be historic. It may not be his last visit to the chambers of Congress. And I wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Netanyahu
The Iranians have made threats to “wipe Israel off the map”, presumably with nuclear weapons that they would acquire either by Obama’s willingness or by their deception, the Jewish world population would be cut nearly in half. And this is what it’s all about when the Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu addresses Congress.. As he said the world must act to prevent Iran’s nuclearization, since “the deadline for attaining this goal is getting extremely close.
And the only thing Netanyahu knows for sure is that the Iranians remain intent on being able to produce their own nuclear weapons. The only question left is will they do so with or without Obama’s help and his “blessing”!
Netanyahu is worried about Iran’s nuclear weapons program and the survival of nearly half of all the Jews in the world because they live in Israel.
It’s no secret there is no love-loss between Bibi Netanyahu and Barack Obama, but this third effort to urge Congress to go on record supporting the survival of Israel is necessary.
Obama has said in no uncertain terms that he wants to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. However, the world has learned that what is said by Iran is far from the truth.
What Netanyahu also knows is that President Obama seems to have blind spot when it comes to the growing anti-Semitism that resembles what existed in the 1930s in Europe. When Jews in a French kosher supermarket were murdered, Obama referred to it as an act of “violent, vicious zealots who behead people or randomly shoot a bunch of folks in a deli in Paris.”
Whoa! Siad Obama, It wasn’t “a bunch of folks.” They were Jews buying food for the Sabbath meal. And those “violent, vicious zealots” were Muslims, just like the ISIS Muslims beheading, crucifying, burning, kidnapping, and enslaving those they don’t kill for being Christian, Jewish, Yazidis, or just not Muslim enough!
Netanyahu’s speech will, indeed, be historic. It may not be his last visit to the chambers of Congress. And I wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Netanyahu
Monday, February 2, 2015
“benghazi, Benghazi, BENGHAZI”
So the Hilderbeast is going to testify on Benghazi again.. Well what is going to change? It doesn't matter what she says or what additional information may come out of this, she has lied over and over again, what makes anyone think that she won’t lie again? She's never going to tell the truth because if she did the whole country would know what an incompetent asshole she really is. So, “What difference does it make”? To that Cold Fish the 4 dead Americans were just "Bumps in the Road"
Yes, benghazi, Benghazi, BENGHAZI!!! I will never stop saying Benghazi!!
On that day in September 2012, a complete all out planned attack was made on the American Ambassador’s compound in Benghazi and killed four Americans, the American Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. In addition to the loss of these four brave men, ten others were injured in these attacks.
President Obama refused to call the attack on the compound what it was a terrorist attack claiming that he had evidence that it was because of a Youtube video that was detrimental to the prophet Muhammad. This lie was so obvious that even the Washington Post didn’t buy it.
The Administration had absolutely NO interest in telling the truth, in regards to the Benghazi attack because they knew it will lead, the truth will show the total incompetence in leadership of both King Obama and Her Majesty Hillary. They were already dead set to protect Hillary at all cost. Hillary was already the “Chosen One” for 2016. So here we are today.
Well now we are going to have the Butcher of Benghaz running for the office of the presidency of the United Stated of America! The highest office in the world! With all her Lies, Coverups, and Fabrications, she is still the choice of 50 percent of America. This tells us a lot of what this country has come to doesn’t it.
The problem we have is that the majority of Americans are clueless and couldn't even tell you who Ben Gazy is.
The average and typical Liberal/Democrat voter will go on loving and supporting this pathetic liar. Can all these people be that completely ill-informed? I don’t think so, I rather think that they are just brainwashed Koolaide drinkers.
And how about our Government? Do those Governmental officials really believe all the crap that the 3 stooges have been saying? The State Department assholes should all be fired for their incompetence.
There was no video protest at the compound, it was a planned and orchestrated attack by al qaeda.
What angered me most about Benghazi was not that it was a botched covert operation because things like that happens all the time, but rather Hillary's attempt to peddle the “spontaneous video protest” LIE while standing next to the coffin of Ambassador Chris Stevens...
She gave weapons to Islamic terrorists who used them against our people in Benghazi. She did not give the consulate the protection that they needed and she lied about the anti-Muhammad video sparking a spontaneous attack. This will come back to haunt her.
It's disgusting! And yeah, this was all because of that hateful youtube video that was Detrimental to the Prophet Muhammad.
One can only hope that this murdering, lying, arrogant beast will never be President, the thought alone is sickening! God help us if she actually wins the Presidency.
Thursday, August 14, 2014
The Damage Done by the Current President
When I look at the damage done by the current President, it seems more
likely that the nation is locked in a downward death spiral with no
bottom in sight.
And even worse, the number of Americans who remain complacent, and willing to accept the 'new normal' is shocking.
But, as our pals at the NYSun note, we've been in difficult straits before, and all it takes are the right, the 'Right', policies to regain our former greatness.
1. " The thing to remember about the cataract of woe that has befallen our country is how fast things can be turned around. We may be in retreat overseas, with riots simmering in Missouri and the economy stuck in second gear. With the right policies, the right leadership, all that can be overcome.
2. But none of the GOP contenders is capturing this simple point .... It can be turned around, and fast....
3. .... making of that point .... was the valedictory speech given by the editor most associated with the Reagan Revolution, Robert Bartley of the Wall Street Journal.
4. .... he didn’t want to hear about the good old days — since our troubles were nothing compared to what we faced in the 1970s. He was referring to defeat in Vietnam, Soviet expansionism, the collapse of the gold-based monetary system, the rise of world inflation, economic stagnation, the Arab oil embargo, war in the Middle East, soaring unemployment.
5. ..... Henry Kissinger conceded that Bartley had been right to take a harder line than Nixon on the Soviet Union. Jack Kemp toasted Bartley’s leadership of the tax-cutting movement. Theodore Olson, who had won the Bush v. Gore lawsuit that cleared the way for George W. Bush to claim the White House, spoke of Bartley’s commitment to the Constitution.
6. Optimism, [Bartley] said, pays. “In human affairs, nothing is ever solved completely,” he said. He was for the steady application of sound policies, confident that economic and political freedom would triumph..... the president he backed, Ronald Reagan, who ran on the slogan “morning in America.”
7. This is the missing element in today’s politics. In 2008, President Obama promised hope and change. But he lacked the policy chops. The GOP today has the policy chops, but nailing the optimism is key.
8. Bartley stood for two big things. One was a military buildup to meet the Soviets. The other was economic growth.
9. Reagan took office in the wake of a recession (in 1980.... once the tax cuts came in, wow did the economy respond. At the Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker choked off inflation by pushing up interest rates above 20 percent. And the value of the dollar on Reagan’s watch soared. (Measured in gold, it rose 38% to one-405th of an ounce of gold.)
a. Within nine years of when Reagan was sworn in, the Soviet Union was gone — voosh.
10. Under President Obama, the dollar has lost a third of its value (it’s up from its low but still down to barely more than a 1,300th of an ounce of gold). ... people feel poor. Unemployment is still above 6%, higher if you count people who’ve given up looking for work. ....the point Bartley stressed — how fast things changed once the right policies were brought to bear. Find the candidate who can give voice to that optimism, and that is the candidate with the winning formula."
And even worse, the number of Americans who remain complacent, and willing to accept the 'new normal' is shocking.
But, as our pals at the NYSun note, we've been in difficult straits before, and all it takes are the right, the 'Right', policies to regain our former greatness.
1. " The thing to remember about the cataract of woe that has befallen our country is how fast things can be turned around. We may be in retreat overseas, with riots simmering in Missouri and the economy stuck in second gear. With the right policies, the right leadership, all that can be overcome.
2. But none of the GOP contenders is capturing this simple point .... It can be turned around, and fast....
3. .... making of that point .... was the valedictory speech given by the editor most associated with the Reagan Revolution, Robert Bartley of the Wall Street Journal.
4. .... he didn’t want to hear about the good old days — since our troubles were nothing compared to what we faced in the 1970s. He was referring to defeat in Vietnam, Soviet expansionism, the collapse of the gold-based monetary system, the rise of world inflation, economic stagnation, the Arab oil embargo, war in the Middle East, soaring unemployment.
5. ..... Henry Kissinger conceded that Bartley had been right to take a harder line than Nixon on the Soviet Union. Jack Kemp toasted Bartley’s leadership of the tax-cutting movement. Theodore Olson, who had won the Bush v. Gore lawsuit that cleared the way for George W. Bush to claim the White House, spoke of Bartley’s commitment to the Constitution.
6. Optimism, [Bartley] said, pays. “In human affairs, nothing is ever solved completely,” he said. He was for the steady application of sound policies, confident that economic and political freedom would triumph..... the president he backed, Ronald Reagan, who ran on the slogan “morning in America.”
7. This is the missing element in today’s politics. In 2008, President Obama promised hope and change. But he lacked the policy chops. The GOP today has the policy chops, but nailing the optimism is key.
8. Bartley stood for two big things. One was a military buildup to meet the Soviets. The other was economic growth.
9. Reagan took office in the wake of a recession (in 1980.... once the tax cuts came in, wow did the economy respond. At the Federal Reserve, Paul Volcker choked off inflation by pushing up interest rates above 20 percent. And the value of the dollar on Reagan’s watch soared. (Measured in gold, it rose 38% to one-405th of an ounce of gold.)
a. Within nine years of when Reagan was sworn in, the Soviet Union was gone — voosh.
10. Under President Obama, the dollar has lost a third of its value (it’s up from its low but still down to barely more than a 1,300th of an ounce of gold). ... people feel poor. Unemployment is still above 6%, higher if you count people who’ve given up looking for work. ....the point Bartley stressed — how fast things changed once the right policies were brought to bear. Find the candidate who can give voice to that optimism, and that is the candidate with the winning formula."
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
Obama urges Israel, "Not to destabilize the situation" over the slaughtered teens
STFU Obama!
You aren't a friend to Israel in fact quite the opposite. You allow murdering thugs to torture and kill Americans in Benghazi. You are weak and a laughing stock around the world. Israel knows her security lies in strength, not cowardice.. Israel has the absolute right to seek justice so butt the hell out, and go tell your stupid stories to the Lesbian crowd, or go play another round of Golf!
You aren't a friend to Israel in fact quite the opposite. You allow murdering thugs to torture and kill Americans in Benghazi. You are weak and a laughing stock around the world. Israel knows her security lies in strength, not cowardice.. Israel has the absolute right to seek justice so butt the hell out, and go tell your stupid stories to the Lesbian crowd, or go play another round of Golf!
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Fascism and Progressives: An Intimate Relationship
The first fascist nation was right here, in America, under the first Progressive President.
1. Here, ....check Woodrow Wilson's America:
a. Had the world’s first modern propaganda ministry
b. Political prisoners by the thousands were harassed, beaten, spied upon and thrown in jail for simply expressing private opinions.
c. The national leader accused foreigners and immigrants of injecting treasonous ‘poison’ into the American bloodstream
d. Newspapers and magazines were closed for criticizing the government
e. Almost 100,000 government propaganda agents were sent out to whip up support for the regime and the war
f. College professors imposed loyalty oaths on their colleagues
g. Nearly a quarter million ‘goons’ were given legal authority to beat and intimidate ‘slackers’ and dissenters
h. Leading artists and writers dedicated their work to proselytizing for the government.
2. Americans of the era saw it as such....and expelled the Democrats/Progressives/Liberals
They were thoroughly rejected by the voters in the election of 1920:
“The United States presidential election of 1920 was dominated by the aftermath of World War I and the hostile reaction to Woodrow Wilson, the Democratic president. Harding's victory remains the largest popular-vote percentage margin (60.3% to 34.1%) in Presidential elections after the so-called "Era of Good Feelings" ended with the victory of James Monroe in the election of 1820. ” United States presidential election, 1920 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
“In the 1920 election, he and his running-mate, Calvin Coolidge, defeated Democrat and fellow Ohioan James M. Cox, in what was then the largest presidential popular vote landslide in American history since the popular vote tally began to be recorded in 1824: 60.36% to 34.19%.” Warren G. Harding - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
3. Obama- using the IRS against political enemies, spying on every citizen, assuming the rights of the legislative branch.....pretty much the textbook definition of a fascist regime.
4. Now this:
a. "Big chill: Feds want to scour Net, media for 'hate speech'
b. If two Democratic lawmakers have their way, Barack Obama’s Justice Department will submit a report for action against any Internet sites, broadcast, cable television or radio shows determined to be advocating or encouraging “violent acts.”
c. ....calls for the Justice Department and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights to “analyze information on the use of telecommunications, including the Internet, broadcast television and radio, cable television, public access television, commercial mobile services, and other electronic media, to advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate.”
d.The bill does not define which actions by broadcasters would be considered to have encouraged violence, seemingly leaving that open to interpretation.
e. The Boston Herald took issue with the bill, calling it “frankly chilling”....seeking to “empower an obscure federal agency to begin scouring the Internet, TV and radio for speech it finds threatening.”
Read more at Big chill: Feds want to scour Net, media for ?hate speech?
Time for the current Americans to open their eyes.
1. Here, ....check Woodrow Wilson's America:
a. Had the world’s first modern propaganda ministry
b. Political prisoners by the thousands were harassed, beaten, spied upon and thrown in jail for simply expressing private opinions.
c. The national leader accused foreigners and immigrants of injecting treasonous ‘poison’ into the American bloodstream
d. Newspapers and magazines were closed for criticizing the government
e. Almost 100,000 government propaganda agents were sent out to whip up support for the regime and the war
f. College professors imposed loyalty oaths on their colleagues
g. Nearly a quarter million ‘goons’ were given legal authority to beat and intimidate ‘slackers’ and dissenters
h. Leading artists and writers dedicated their work to proselytizing for the government.
2. Americans of the era saw it as such....and expelled the Democrats/Progressives/Liberals
They were thoroughly rejected by the voters in the election of 1920:
“The United States presidential election of 1920 was dominated by the aftermath of World War I and the hostile reaction to Woodrow Wilson, the Democratic president. Harding's victory remains the largest popular-vote percentage margin (60.3% to 34.1%) in Presidential elections after the so-called "Era of Good Feelings" ended with the victory of James Monroe in the election of 1820. ” United States presidential election, 1920 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
“In the 1920 election, he and his running-mate, Calvin Coolidge, defeated Democrat and fellow Ohioan James M. Cox, in what was then the largest presidential popular vote landslide in American history since the popular vote tally began to be recorded in 1824: 60.36% to 34.19%.” Warren G. Harding - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
3. Obama- using the IRS against political enemies, spying on every citizen, assuming the rights of the legislative branch.....pretty much the textbook definition of a fascist regime.
4. Now this:
a. "Big chill: Feds want to scour Net, media for 'hate speech'
b. If two Democratic lawmakers have their way, Barack Obama’s Justice Department will submit a report for action against any Internet sites, broadcast, cable television or radio shows determined to be advocating or encouraging “violent acts.”
c. ....calls for the Justice Department and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights to “analyze information on the use of telecommunications, including the Internet, broadcast television and radio, cable television, public access television, commercial mobile services, and other electronic media, to advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate.”
d.The bill does not define which actions by broadcasters would be considered to have encouraged violence, seemingly leaving that open to interpretation.
e. The Boston Herald took issue with the bill, calling it “frankly chilling”....seeking to “empower an obscure federal agency to begin scouring the Internet, TV and radio for speech it finds threatening.”
Read more at Big chill: Feds want to scour Net, media for ?hate speech?
Time for the current Americans to open their eyes.
Saturday, April 26, 2014
More Proof Krauthammer, ... Failed to Expose the Real Obama ... Was He Naive or Was He Dishonest?
Back in 2008, as I watched the run-up to the election, I recall being disappointed when Charles Krauthammer, speaking on Fox News, refused to identify Obama as a Socialist.
He would not even use the term.
1. Charles Krauthammer: “Obama Has Never Been a Mystery” Where was the “Mystery” every other conservative was clearly able to see through him)
2. Charles Krauthammer is typically held in the highest regard by some media personalities on the right.... Krauthammer revealed to Bret Baier of Fox News that neither he nor George Will knew a thing about “the real” Barack Obama back in 2008 prior to the latter’s election to the presidency.
3. Let this sink in: Krauthammer and George Will , veteran media commentators—self-avowed “conservative” commentators—admit, and think nothing of admitting, that up until his election, they just couldn’t figure out what kind of president Obama promised to be. This is amazing.
Among those amazed by Krauthammer’s and Will’s professed ignorance was Rush Limbaugh.
4. On his nationally syndicated radio show, on October 28, Limbaugh remarked: “I am convinced that all conservatives know a statist and a big-government redistributionist when they see one, especially people like Krauthammer and Will.” In disbelief, he added: “It doesn’t compute with me that they didn’t know [who Obama really was].”.... Limbaugh understood him all too well.
5. At the time of the election of 2008, there was no conceivable justification for anyone, much less seasoned right-leaning commentators, to have had any doubts whatsoever about Obama.
a. His relationships with an array of radicals from the political cesspool of Chicago, radicals like convicted terrorist Bill Ayers, were well established.
b. ... two memoirs....revealed for all with eyes to realize it that Obama’s had been a lifelong preoccupation with racial identity—and racial politics.
c. ...Obama resisted efforts to provide legal protection for those infants who had survived botched abortions,...
d. ... on record for lamenting the fact that the United States Constitution makes no allowances for wealth redistribution—or what Obama and his ilk call “positive liberty.”
e. ... months before Obama was elected to the Oval Office, the name of Jeremiah Wright became known to the nation.Wright is an impassioned advocate of “Black Liberation Theology” and a close friend of Louis Farrakhan and the late Muammar Gaddafi.
f. For over 20 years Obama sat in the pews of Wright’s church, a church in which the congregation was routinely subjected to sermons chock full of racially-charged diatribes.... in which he memorably remarks that “white folks’ greed runs a world in need”—a line that Obama would approvingly draw upon himself.
6. And yet, we are expected to believe, Wright had no influence over the development of Obama’s worldview. Apparently, Krauthammer and Will did believe this.
7. ... if Obama had been white and had a track record of allying himself with neo-Nazis or Klansmen, or even had he been a little too close to “isolationists” like, say, Pat Buchanan or Ron Paul, Krauthammer and Will would’ve wasted no time to judge him for what he was .
He would not even use the term.
1. Charles Krauthammer: “Obama Has Never Been a Mystery” Where was the “Mystery” every other conservative was clearly able to see through him)
2. Charles Krauthammer is typically held in the highest regard by some media personalities on the right.... Krauthammer revealed to Bret Baier of Fox News that neither he nor George Will knew a thing about “the real” Barack Obama back in 2008 prior to the latter’s election to the presidency.
3. Let this sink in: Krauthammer and George Will , veteran media commentators—self-avowed “conservative” commentators—admit, and think nothing of admitting, that up until his election, they just couldn’t figure out what kind of president Obama promised to be. This is amazing.
Among those amazed by Krauthammer’s and Will’s professed ignorance was Rush Limbaugh.
4. On his nationally syndicated radio show, on October 28, Limbaugh remarked: “I am convinced that all conservatives know a statist and a big-government redistributionist when they see one, especially people like Krauthammer and Will.” In disbelief, he added: “It doesn’t compute with me that they didn’t know [who Obama really was].”.... Limbaugh understood him all too well.
5. At the time of the election of 2008, there was no conceivable justification for anyone, much less seasoned right-leaning commentators, to have had any doubts whatsoever about Obama.
a. His relationships with an array of radicals from the political cesspool of Chicago, radicals like convicted terrorist Bill Ayers, were well established.
b. ... two memoirs....revealed for all with eyes to realize it that Obama’s had been a lifelong preoccupation with racial identity—and racial politics.
c. ...Obama resisted efforts to provide legal protection for those infants who had survived botched abortions,...
d. ... on record for lamenting the fact that the United States Constitution makes no allowances for wealth redistribution—or what Obama and his ilk call “positive liberty.”
e. ... months before Obama was elected to the Oval Office, the name of Jeremiah Wright became known to the nation.Wright is an impassioned advocate of “Black Liberation Theology” and a close friend of Louis Farrakhan and the late Muammar Gaddafi.
f. For over 20 years Obama sat in the pews of Wright’s church, a church in which the congregation was routinely subjected to sermons chock full of racially-charged diatribes.... in which he memorably remarks that “white folks’ greed runs a world in need”—a line that Obama would approvingly draw upon himself.
6. And yet, we are expected to believe, Wright had no influence over the development of Obama’s worldview. Apparently, Krauthammer and Will did believe this.
7. ... if Obama had been white and had a track record of allying himself with neo-Nazis or Klansmen, or even had he been a little too close to “isolationists” like, say, Pat Buchanan or Ron Paul, Krauthammer and Will would’ve wasted no time to judge him for what he was .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)